Bernhard Schieber

Field Theory of Conflict: Change the Field Before Demanding Movement

Communication · Executive Insight Brief · 481

Stuck, not unwilling

Field Theory of Conflict reads impasse as a configuration of attractions, threats, barriers, and competing directions in the life space, not weak motivation or difficult personality

Premise

People can be strongly motivated and still remain stuck. Kurt Lewin’s Field Theory of Conflict explains conflict through the current “life space”: the person and the psychologically effective environment, including attractive and aversive regions, barriers, social forces, and possible routes of movement. Conflict appears when that field generates incompatible directions.

This changes how hesitation, vacillation, and avoidance should be read. An executive delaying a decision may not need more urgency; two units fighting over access may not need better tone. The relevant diagnosis is what attracts, repels, blocks, or redirects movement now, and whether the intervention changes that field rather than merely exhorting the actor.

Field Theory of Conflict — Stuck, not unwilling. Executive Insight Brief 160 by Bernhard Schieber.

Continue in the series

  • The essential model
  • Why this matters
  • Risks and limits
  • Executive takeaway
  • Key questions
  • Selected sources

The full brief is in its volume, with the other works of the series.

See the books →

Or start with a sample brief →

New works are announced in The Debrief. Subscribe →

Brief 0Axiom 0: Communication is EverythingRead the axiom →
What these mean

Editorial orientation · Family

Model

In this series, Model names the editorial family primarily used to understand and explain communication: theories, frameworks, effects, traditions, principles and other conceptual resources. It is an umbrella for a route into the field, not a claim that every included object is a predictive model.

Editorial orientation · Category

Theories & Explanatory Models

Explains how or why a communication process works by relating mechanisms, conditions or variables. Its value is an account that can guide inquiry into what produces an outcome, rather than a name for the outcome alone.

Browse the Communication premises · Knowledge