Communication · Executive Insight Brief · 355
Check who actually wanted the decision
Harvey’s paradox shows how groups can enact a collectively unwanted decision when members mistake imagined consensus for one another’s actual preferences
Premise
Unanimity can conceal a communication failure. In the Abilene Paradox, members privately do not prefer a course of action, yet each assumes others want it and treats dissent as socially dangerous. Support is voiced, objections remain private, and the group creates behavioral agreement around an outcome that may have had no genuine preference base.
The diagnostic consequence is precise: before asking why a team agreed, establish whether it actually did. The failure is not unresolved conflict but mismanaged agreement. Negotiating harder will not solve a decision produced by false beliefs about one another’s wishes.
What the model is: Abilene Paradox in Knowledge →
Continue in the series
- The essential model
- Why this matters
- Risks and limits
- Executive takeaway
- Key questions
- Selected sources
This is one of eleven sample briefs. Confirm your email to read it in full — you will also receive The Debrief.
The complete briefs are published in volumes, with the other works of the series. See the books →
- FamilyModel
- CategoryEffects, Biases & Phenomena
- DomainGroups & Decisions
What these mean
Editorial orientation · Family
Model
In this series, Model names the editorial family primarily used to understand and explain communication: theories, frameworks, effects, traditions, principles and other conceptual resources. It is an umbrella for a route into the field, not a claim that every included object is a predictive model.
Editorial orientation · Category
Effects, Biases & Phenomena
Identifies a bounded pattern in judgment, behavior or communication and the conditions under which it appears. Naming the pattern makes a recurring difficulty recognizable; it does not make the pattern inevitable or supply a complete explanation.
- KnowledgeAbilene Paradox
- Related briefGroupthink: Protect the Decision From Premature Agreement