Bernhard Schieber

Interaction Adaptation Theory: Manage the Interaction, Not Just the Individual

Communication · Executive Insight Brief · 089

Observe what each person is adapting to

Reciprocity and compensation are responses within a moving dyadic system, not reliable evidence of a fixed communication style

Premise

Leaders often evaluate communication one person at a time: one colleague is too forceful, another too quiet, a customer defensive, an interviewer cold. Yet pace, volume, gaze, distance, disclosure, warmth, silence, and turn-taking change in response to another person’s behavior. What looks like an individual trait may be an adaptation generated by the interaction.

Interaction Adaptation Theory gives executives a way to diagnose that movement. Developed by Judee K. Burgoon, Lesa A. Stern, and Leesa Dillman, it explains why people sometimes reciprocate a partner’s behavior, sometimes compensate in the opposite direction, and sometimes adjust in other ways. The practical unit of analysis is the dyad and its sequence, not an isolated performance.

Interaction Adaptation Theory — Observe what each person is adapting to. Executive Insight Brief 089 by Bernhard Schieber.

Continue in the series

  • The essential model
  • Why this matters
  • Risks and limits
  • Executive takeaway
  • Key questions
  • Selected sources

The full brief is part of the complete collection of Executive Insight Briefs.

Get the volumes →

Or start with a brief you can read in full →

New works are announced in The Debrief. Subscribe →

Brief 0Axiom 0: Communication is EverythingRead the axiom →
What these mean

Editorial orientation · Family

Model

In this series, Model names the editorial family primarily used to understand and explain communication: theories, frameworks, effects, traditions, principles and other conceptual resources. It is an umbrella for a route into the field, not a claim that every included object is a predictive model.

Editorial orientation · Category

Theories & Explanatory Models

Explains how or why a communication process works by relating mechanisms, conditions or variables. Its value is an account that can guide inquiry into what produces an outcome, rather than a name for the outcome alone.

All Communication briefs · Knowledge