Communication · Executive Insight Brief · 175
More direct is not always better
A self-report total records endorsed behavior across thirty described situations, and cannot define appropriate or competent conduct in any of them.
Premise
Organizations often treat assertiveness as an uncomplicated leadership virtue. The Rathus Assertiveness Schedule makes the construct measurable, but it also exposes why that assumption is unsafe. The score reflects endorsement of behaviors associated with expressing needs, disagreement, requests, preferences, or rights. It does not determine whether greater directness is respectful, effective, culturally appropriate, or safe in a particular hierarchy. Its executive use is to identify where further behavioral inquiry is warranted.
What the model is: Rathus Assertiveness Schedule (RAS) in Knowledge →
Continue in the series
- The essential model
- Why this matters
- Risks and limits
- Executive takeaway
- Key questions
- Selected sources
The full brief is part of the complete collection of Executive Insight Briefs.
Or start with a brief you can read in full →
New works are announced in The Debrief. Subscribe →
- FamilyTool
- CategoryMeasurement & Assessment Instruments
- DomainConversation & Relationships
What these mean
Editorial orientation · Family
Tool
In this series, Tool names the editorial family primarily used to act on, examine, measure or organize communication. It includes instruments, methods, practices, protocols, codes and institutional arrangements. Membership does not certify effectiveness, portability or safe use in every setting.
Editorial orientation · Category
Measurement & Assessment Instruments
Produces measures, scores, profiles or assessments through defined items, observations or measurement rules. The entry identifies what is measured and the conditions governing interpretation.